SOMZ: Saviors on Mt
Zion
The Second Rescue: A
Plan to “rescue” our relatives and friends mentioned in our history books to
ensure all of them have received all temple blessings.
Temple Project 23 April 2014 LaRae
Free Kerr, M ED
itsallrelatives@sfcn.org
801.885.8468 2969 East
Somerset Drive, Spanish Fork, UT 84660
This is an invitation to all family members to complete and
correct temple work for all relatives and friends found in our history books:
Dollie
Find Your Actual, Factual
Ancestors [There are relatives mentioned throughout.]
George Allen Wadsworth –
Pilley to Panaca 30th anniversary edition
Hollingshead/Rollins
Family
It’s All Relatives Columns
[There are relatives mentioned throughout.]
Pulsipher Family History
Books
Rachel Dibley Wheeler Free
Samuel Lee Family History
and Genealogy
Thomas Sirls Terry Family
The inspiration to make sure all the people named in the
above books have temple privileges, along with their families, came about in
this way:
Some years ago a Stake President in Wyoming was inspired to
“rescue” the members of the Willie and Martin Handcart companies a second time
by making sure their temple work was done. Several times in the last months, and
then again during a particular conference April 2014 conference talk, I felt
very strongly that the temple work for these people needed to be completed.
“Rescuing” the above books and making them available to all
was a tremendous endeavor I believe will save our families. But have all the temple ordinances been done for every
name in every one of those books? I know
that the Lory and Myrtle Joy Free family did much temple work for relatives.
But the procedures and possibilities have changed several times over the
years. The extraction program, for
example, made no effort to seal families together, only providing baptisms and
endowments for those found in parish registers.
I do not know if any effort was made to provide temple ordinances for
those in the Hollingshead, Pulsipher, Lee and Terry books. In addition, I have made some major
corrections in the Wadsworth and Broadbent pedigrees in the last two
years. I know those sealings have not
yet been done.
Therefore, there will be corrections to make in the temple
work. People will be sealed to the wrong
parents, for example. And though that
cannot be undone, we can, at the very least, also offer sealings to the correct
parents. We can make sure all known
children are sealed into families and do whatever temple work has been left
undone.
The protocol for these temple ordinances would be as
follows:
1.
Accept an assignment for one or more families
out of one or more books. And let the administrator of this project know
exactly which family from which book you will be working on.
2.
Take that information to the local family
history center [or do it at home if you have the resources] and ask the kind
people there to help you discover first what legitimate temple work has been
done for each person in that family and add it to the database, and second, if
anything is left undone:
3.
Prepare that name for temple work. Then arrange
for the temple work to be done.
4.
Search the digitized documents on
familysearch.org [and other sites you may have access to] for true sources on
each family. Digitized documents are as
good as the originals. Such documents as birth and death certificates are
primary sources [because they are original] and can generally be believed.
Obituaries and censuses are actually secondary sources [because they are
retold], but are often fairly factual. The published pedigrees found at
familysearch.org and ancestry.com and on other such sites are not sources at
all but guesses, and often very poor ones so should not be believed at all. Use
these only as guides to prove or disprove.
5.
I highly recommend finding the family in one or
more censuses at the family history library or on familysearch.org or another
online source to double check the members of the family. [See census summary
below to know some of the facts censuses do NOT provide.]
Further, there is a group of about 96 people who, similar to
the handcart pioneers who were “rescued” a second time in Wyoming, were members
of the Church in Pilley, England when Uncle James Wadsworth was the Branch President. They were baptized, though for some the dates
have been lost, so that ordinance will need to be repeated. But it looks to me
like many of them never received temple blessings. Only a few, apparently, crossed the plains.
These early church members need to be “rescued” again by having their temple
work done.
[Part of our
Wadsworth family was in the Hunt Baggage Train which was directed to follow the
Martin and Willie handcart pioneers and help them. Annie Hicks who eventually
married Absalom Pennington Free was in the Martin Company. Our Evans family was
in a handcart company just preceeding these ill-fated companies.]
You MUST know, understand and believe the following in order
to prepare these names for salvation:
1.
The digitized
documents found at familysearch.org and on other genealogical sites are as good
as the originals. Use them. Such
documents are actual records recorded when the person lived by people who
actually knew them. Please get the
difference between actual documents [which the Church has been indexing]
clearly separated from lists and non-documents such as published pedigrees.
Published pedigrees are NOT documents. They are NOT sources. See item 2 next.
2.
Published
pedigrees such as those found on familysearch.org and ancestry.com are
incorrect. Yes, they are. Do not ever cut and paste them or add their info
to your databases. Use them as guides to research only. Look at any given family in these internet pedigrees,
and you will find children born many years after either the mother or father
died. You will find children listed by their given names AND their nicknames as
though they were two children. You will find grandparents listed as children.
Yes, you will. So whoever takes on these projects will have to base their
family data on the info in the books. True, the books are secondary unless the
documents are included in the books. But the pedigrees are about tentiary.
For example. I had just done extensive
research in parish records in the Family History Library in SLC on the wife of
a John Wadsworth in England. I had found the correct wife and gone to a great
deal of effort to remove the wrong wife from John’s family group record and
pedigree. In the same trip, I ran into a
relative messing around in the library. She came up to me all excited to tell
me she had found this John Wadsworth’s wife. You know what happened: She was
excited about this wife I had just spent hours and dollars proving was the
wrong wife - with documentation. And she had added the wrong wife back in.
YIKES
THE DATA IN PUBLISHED PEDIGREE CHARTS SUCH
AS THOSE FOUND ON FAMILYSEARCH.ORG AND ANCESTRY.COM AND OTHER BIG DATABASES IS
WRONG!
3.
Read all
names phonetically. Standardized spelling is a very recent phenomenon. I’ve got many records where the person
himself spelled his name several different ways in the same document. So
Wadsworth is Wordsworth, Waddysworth, Waswort, even Asworth, etc. depending on
the education of the writer and person, the accent of the area, etc.
4.
The
Church standards prevent temple work being done for anyone less than 110 years
old unless a death record is present. This
means that there should be many names in these books that were written in the
1950s and 1960s who did not meet that requirement but will be old enough now to
be able to get their temple work done.
5. Here is a wonderful and very brief
description of what census records do and do not show.
1940 is the last available census at this time.
Facts you should know about the early census records -
All census records [1790 - 1840] prior to the 1850 census
ONLY listed the head of household; whether male or female.
NO specific age was stated for any family member
NO place of birth was stated - city, state, or country
NO city, town, or village is stated - only the county;
however some census takers listed the township
NO street address was stated
NO marital status was stated - single, married, widowed,
or divorced
NO family relationship was stated - brother, sister,
cousin, son, daughter, wife, inlaw, etc.
NO occupation was stated
NO parental birthplaces are stated
NO race was stated [but assume "white"]
1850, 1860 & 1870 census records do not show family
relationships, marital status or parental birthplaces.
Step children are not enumerated as "step"
children
Adopted children are not enumerated as
"adopted"
Grand children are not enumerated as "grand
children"
Orphaned children were not enumerated as
"orphan"
Immigration date is not recorded
1850 is the 1st census that shows all family members with
their birthplaces
1880 is the 1st census that shows parental birthplaces
and family relationships
The above summary of census records is from thomasker2.
6.
Much more
information is available in the Find Your Actual, Factual Ancestors ebook
available at www.freefamilyhistorybook.com. The first part of the book is free
whether you buy the rest or not. But the whole thing is under $10. I will be revising it soon because the
technology has changed mightily since I wrote it. But the genealogical how tos
are still spot on.
It is my hope that we will find and record whatever
temple work has been done for those mentioned in these history books, that we
will complete the work not yet done, and thereby bless our whole family, living
and dead.
Thank you and God bless us every one, LaRae Free Kerr
No comments:
Post a Comment